Two years after publicly launching the AI Incident Database (AIID) as a collection of harms or near harms produced by AI in the world, a backlog of "issues" that do not meet its incident ingestion criteria have accumulated in its review queue. Despite not passing the database's current criteria for incidents, these issues advance human understanding of where AI presents the potential for harm. Similar to databases in aviation and computer security, the AIID proposes to adopt a two-tiered system for indexing AI incidents (i.e., a harm or near harm event) and issues (i.e., a risk of a harm event). Further, as some machine learning-based systems will sometimes produce a large number of incidents, the notion of an incident "variant" is introduced. These proposed changes mark the transition of the AIID to a new version in response to lessons learned from editing 2,000+ incident reports and additional reports that fall under the new category of "issue."
翻译:在公开推出AI事件数据库(AIID)作为AI在世界范围内产生的伤害或近似伤害的集合,两年后,在审查队列中积累了不符合其事故摄入标准的“问题”积压。尽管没有通过数据库目前的事故标准,但这些问题提高了人们对AI可能造成伤害之处的理解。与航空和计算机安全数据库一样,AI事件数据库提议采用一个双层系统,对AI事件(即伤害或近乎伤害事件)和问题(即伤害事件风险)和问题(即伤害事件风险)进行索引。 此外,由于一些机器学习系统有时会产生大量事件,因此引入了事件“变化”的概念。这些拟议变化标志着AID根据从编辑2,000多起事件报告以及属于新的“问题”类别的其他报告获得的经验教训,向新版本过渡。