Denizens of Silicon Valley have called Moore's Law "the most important graph in human history," and economists have found that Moore's Law-powered I.T. revolution has been one of the most important sources of national productivity growth. But data substantiating these claims tend to either be abstracted - for example by examining spending on I.T., rather than I.T. itself - or anecdotal. In this paper, we assemble direct quantitative evidence of the impact that computing power has had on five domains: two computing bellwethers (Chess and Go), and three economically important applications (weather prediction, protein folding, and oil exploration). Computing power explains 49%-94% of the performance improvements in these domains. But whereas economic theory typically assumes a power-law relationship between inputs and outputs, we find that an exponential increase in computing power is needed to get linear improvements in these outcomes. This helps clarify why the exponential growth of computing power from Moore's Law has been so important for progress, and why performance improvements across many domains are becoming economically tenuous as Moore's Law breaks down.
翻译:硅谷的否认者称摩尔法“人类史上最重要的图表 ”, 经济学家发现摩尔法力I.T.革命是国家生产力增长的最重要来源之一。但支持这些主张的数据往往要么被抽象化 — — 比如通过研究I.T.上的花费而不是I.T.本身 — — 要么是传闻。在本文中,我们收集了计算能力对五个领域影响的直接量化证据:两个计算贝瑟斯(济斯和果)以及三个重要的经济应用(天气预测、蛋白质折叠和石油勘探 ) 。 计算能力解释了这些领域49%到94%的绩效改进。 但是,尽管经济理论通常在投入和产出之间形成一种权力-法律关系,但我们发现计算能力需要指数增长才能获得这些结果的线性改善。 这有助于澄清为什么摩尔法的计算能力指数增长对于进步如此重要,以及为什么随着摩尔法的崩溃,许多领域的绩效改善正在变得十分脆弱。