Increasingly high-stakes decisions are made using neural networks in order to make predictions. Specifically, meteorologists and hedge funds apply these techniques to time series data. When it comes to prediction, there are certain limitations for machine learning models (such as lack of expressiveness, vulnerability of domain shifts and overconfidence) which can be solved using uncertainty estimation. There is a set of expectations regarding how uncertainty should ``behave". For instance, a wider prediction horizon should lead to more uncertainty or the model's confidence should be proportional to its accuracy. In this paper, different uncertainty estimation methods are compared to forecast meteorological time series data and evaluate these expectations. The results show how each uncertainty estimation method performs on the forecasting task, which partially evaluates the robustness of predicted uncertainty.
翻译:为了作出预测,利用神经网络作出了越来越高的测算决定。具体地说,气象学家和对冲基金将这些技术应用于时间序列数据。在预测方面,机器学习模型(如缺乏清晰度、域变脆弱和过度自信)存在某些限制,这些限制可以通过不确定性估计来解决。对于不确定性如何“应如何行事”有一套期望。例如,更广泛的预测前景应导致更多的不确定性,或者模型的可信度应与其准确性成正比。在本文中,将不同的不确定性估计方法与预测的气象时间序列数据进行比较,并评估这些预期。结果显示每个不确定性估计方法如何在预测任务上进行,部分评估预测不确定性的可靠性。