Location tags enable tracking of personal belongings. This is achieved locally, e.g., via Bluetooth with a paired phone, and remotely, by piggybacking on the location reported by location-reporting devices which come into proximity of a tag. There has been anecdotal evidence that location tags are also misused to stalk people. This paper studies the performance of the two most popular location tags (Apple's AirTag and Samsung's SmartTag) through controlled experiments -- with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices -- as well as in-the-wild experiments -- with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. We find that both tags achieve similar performance, e.g., they are located 60% of the times in about 10 minutes within a 100 meter radius. It follows that real time stalking via location tags is impractical, even when both tags are concurrently deployed which achieves comparable accuracy in half the time. Nevertheless, half of a victim's movements can be backtracked accurately (10 meter error) with just a one-hour delay.
翻译:位置标签能够跟踪个人物品。 这是本地实现的, 例如通过蓝牙和配对电话, 以及远程, 其方式是将位置报告设备所报告的位置套在标签附近。 有传闻证据表明, 位置标签也被滥用于跟踪人。 本文通过两个最受欢迎的位置标签( Apple's AirTag 和 Samsung's SmartTag) 的受控实验, 通过已知大量分布的位置报告设备, 以及现场实验, 无法控制遇到的报告设备的数量和种类, 从而模拟实际使用案例。 我们发现, 两种标签的性能相似, 例如, 在100米半径以内, 大约10分钟内, 它们能定位60%的时间。 因此, 实际时间通过位置标签跟踪是不现实的, 即使两个标签同时被安装, 在一半时间里可以达到相似的准确度。 然而, 一半的受害者运动可以精确地追溯到一个小时的( 10米误差) 。</s>