We study the problem of allocating bailouts (stimulus, subsidy allocations) to people participating in a financial network subject to income shocks. We build on the financial clearing framework of Eisenberg and Noe that allows the incorporation of a bailout policy that is based on discrete bailouts motivated by the types of stimulus checks people receive around the world as part of COVID-19 economical relief plans. We show that optimally allocating such bailouts on a financial network in order to maximize a variety of social welfare objectives of this form is a computationally intractable problem. We develop approximation algorithms to optimize these objectives and establish guarantees for their approximation rations. Then, we incorporate multiple fairness constraints in the optimization problems and establish relative bounds on the solutions with versus without these constraints. Finally, we apply our methodology to a variety of data, both in the context of a system of large financial institutions with real-world data, as well as in a realistic societal context with financial interactions between people and businesses for which we use semi-artificial data derived from mobility patterns. Our results suggest that the algorithms we develop and study have reasonable results in practice and outperform other network-based heuristics. We argue that the presented problem through the societal-level lens could assist policymakers in making informed decisions on issuing subsidies.
翻译:我们研究向受收入冲击的金融网络参与者分配救助(刺激、补贴分配)的问题;我们利用艾森堡和诺埃的金融清算框架,将基于世界各地人们作为COVID-19经济救援计划一部分而接受的刺激性检查类型驱动的离散救助政策纳入以刺激性检查为动机的孤立救助政策;我们表明,在金融网络上最佳分配此类救助,以最大限度地实现这种形式的社会福利目标是一个难以计算的问题;我们制定近似算法,优化这些目标,并为近似配给建立保障;然后,我们在优化问题中纳入多种公平性限制,并在解决办法上建立相对的界限;最后,我们将我们的方法应用于各种数据,无论是在拥有真实世界数据的大型金融机构系统的背景下,还是在与人与企业之间金融互动的现实社会背景下,我们使用从流动性模式中得出的半人工数据;我们的结果表明,我们制定和研究的算法,在实践中取得了合理的结果,超越了基于这些限制和没有这些限制的解决办法;最后,我们应用我们的方法来应用各种方法处理各种基于网络的决策。