Automatic fetal brain tissue segmentation can enhance the quantitative assessment of brain development at this critical stage. Deep learning methods represent the state of the art in medical image segmentation and have also achieved impressive results in brain segmentation. However, effective training of a deep learning model to perform this task requires a large number of training images to represent the rapid development of the transient fetal brain structures. On the other hand, manual multi-label segmentation of a large number of 3D images is prohibitive. To address this challenge, we segmented 272 training images, covering 19-39 gestational weeks, using an automatic multi-atlas segmentation strategy based on deformable registration and probabilistic atlas fusion, and manually corrected large errors in those segmentations. Since this process generated a large training dataset with noisy segmentations, we developed a novel label smoothing procedure and a loss function to train a deep learning model with smoothed noisy segmentations. Our proposed methods properly account for the uncertainty in tissue boundaries. We evaluated our method on 23 manually-segmented test images of a separate set of fetuses. Results show that our method achieves an average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.893 and 0.916 for the transient structures of younger and older fetuses, respectively. Our method generated results that were significantly more accurate than several state-of-the-art methods including nnU-Net that achieved the closest results to our method. Our trained model can serve as a valuable tool to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of fetal brain analysis in MRI.
翻译:在关键阶段,对大脑发育的定量评估可以增强对大脑发育的定量评估。深层学习方法代表了医学图像分解的先进程度,也取得了大脑分解方面的令人印象深刻的成果。然而,要对深层学习模式进行有效培训以完成这项任务,需要大量的培训图像来代表瞬态胎儿大脑结构的迅速发展。另一方面,对大量3D图像进行人工多标签分解是令人望而却步的。为了应对这一挑战,我们分解了272个培训图像,覆盖了19-39个妊娠周,采用了基于可变形登记和概率性粒子组合的自动多分解战略,并人工纠正了这些分解过程中的重大错误。由于这一过程产生了大量的培训图像,从而代表了瞬息过程和损失函数。为了应对这一挑战,我们建议的方法对组织界限的不确定性进行了适当的说明。我们用23个人工分解的胎儿一组测试图像进行了评估。结果显示,我们的方法的精确度是:我们的方法实现了最精确的精确度,我们的方法比0.89和最精确的方法更精确,我们用了一个最精确的方法。