Reliable tracking algorithms are essential for automated driving. However, the existing consistency measures are not sufficient to meet the increasing safety demands in the automotive sector. Therefore, this work presents a novel method for self-assessment of single-object tracking in clutter based on Kalman filtering and subjective logic. A key feature of the approach is that it additionally provides a measure of the collected statistical evidence in its online reliability scores. In this way, various aspects of reliability, such as the correctness of the assumed measurement noise, detection probability, and clutter rate, can be monitored in addition to the overall assessment based on the available evidence. Here, we present a mathematical derivation of the reference distribution used in our self-assessment module for our studied problem. Moreover, we introduce a formula that describes how a threshold should be chosen for the degree of conflict, the subjective logic comparison measure used for the reliability decision making. Our approach is evaluated in a challenging simulation scenario designed to model adverse weather conditions. The simulations show that our method can significantly improve the reliability checking of single-object tracking in clutter in several aspects.
翻译:可靠的跟踪算法对于自动驾驶至关重要。 但是,现有的一致性措施不足以满足汽车部门日益增加的安全需求。 因此,这项工作提出了基于卡尔曼过滤法和主观逻辑的对单弹跟踪进行自评的新颖方法。 这种方法的一个主要特点是,它额外提供了对所收集的在线可靠性分数统计证据的量度。 这样,除了基于现有证据的总体评估外,还可以监测可靠性的各个方面,如假设测量噪音的正确性、探测概率和杂乱率。 在这里,我们提供了一种数学推算方法,说明在自评模块中用于我们研究的问题的参考分布。 此外,我们采用了一种公式,说明如何为冲突程度选择阈值,即用于可靠性决策的主观逻辑比较衡量尺度。我们的方法是在一种具有挑战性的模拟假设情景中加以评价的,目的是模拟不利的天气条件。 模拟表明,我们的方法可以大大改进在几个方面对单弹道跟踪的可靠性的检查。