The rise of mobile apps has brought greater convenience and customization for users. However, many apps use analytics services to collect a wide range of user interaction data purportedly to improve their service, while presenting app users with vague or incomplete information about this collection in their privacy policies. Typically, such policies neglect to describe all types of user interaction data or how the data is collected. User interaction data is not directly regulated by privacy legislation such as the GDPR. However, the extent and hidden nature of its collection means both that apps are walking a legal tightrope and that users' trust is at risk. To facilitate transparency and comparison, and based on common phrases used in published privacy policies and Android documentation, we make a standardized collection claim template. Based on static analysis of actual data collection implementations, we compare the privacy policy claims of the top 10 apps to fact-checked collection claims. Our findings reveal that all the claims made by these apps are incomplete. By providing a standardized way of describing user interaction data collection in mobile apps and comparing actual collection practices to privacy policies, this work aims to increase transparency and establish trust between app developers and users.
翻译:移动应用程序的兴起为用户带来了更大的便利和定制。然而,许多应用程序使用分析服务来收集广泛的用户互动数据,据说是为了改进其服务,同时在隐私政策中向应用程序用户提供有关这一收集的信息模糊或不完整。一般来说,这类政策忽视描述所有类型的用户互动数据或数据是如何收集的。用户互动数据没有直接受诸如GDPR等隐私立法的监管。然而,其收集的范围和隐蔽性质意味着应用程序正在绕过法律的紧身线,用户的信任处于风险之中。为了便利透明度和比较,并根据出版的隐私政策和Android文件中使用的通用短语,我们制作了一个标准化的收集索赔模板。根据对实际数据收集实施情况的静态分析,我们比较了前10个应用程序的隐私政策索赔与经过事实核对的收集索赔。我们的调查结果显示,这些应用程序的所有索赔都是不完整的。通过提供一种标准化的方法来描述移动应用程序中的用户互动数据收集,并将实际收集做法与隐私政策进行比较,这项工作的目的是提高透明度,并建立应用程序开发商与用户之间的信任。</s>