Incrementality experiments compare customers exposed to a marketing action designed to increase sales to those randomly assigned to a control group. These experiments suffer from noisy responses which make precise estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) and marketing ROI difficult. We develop a model that improves the precision by estimating separate treatment effects for three latent strata defined by potential outcomes in the experiment -- customers who would buy regardless of ad exposure, those who would buy only if exposed to ads and those who would not buy regardless. The overall ATE is estimated by averaging the strata-level effects, and this produces a more precise estimator of the ATE over a wide range of conditions typical of marketing experiments. Applying the procedure to 5 catalog experiments shows a reduction of 30-60% in the variance of the overall ATE. Analytical results and simulations show that the method decreases the variance of the ATE most when (1) there are large differences in the treatment effect between latent strata and (2) the model is well-identified.
翻译:递增性实验比较了暴露于一种旨在增加销售量的营销行动的客户,这些实验由于反应吵闹而难于准确估计平均治疗效果(ATE)和销售ROI。我们开发了一个模型,通过估计实验潜在结果所定义的三个潜在层的分别治疗效果来提高精确度 -- -- 客户不论广告接触程度如何都会购买,客户只有在接触到广告时才会购买,而客户无论买不买。总体ATE是通过平均层次效应来估计的,从而产生一个更精确的ATE估计数据,它覆盖了营销实验典型的多种条件。对5个目录进行的程序实验显示,总体ATE的差异减少了30-60%。分析结果和模拟表明,当 (1) 潜层和模型之间的治疗效果有很大差异时,该方法会减少ATE的差异。