There is an increased interest from transit agencies to replace fixed-route transit services with on-demand public transits (ODT). However, it is still unclear when and where such a service is efficient and sustainable. To this end, we provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the sustainability of ODT systems from the perspective of overall efficiency, environmental footprint, and social equity and inclusion. The proposed framework is illustrated by applying it to the Town of Innisfil, Ontario, where an ODT system has been implemented since 2017. It can be concluded that when there is adequate supply and no surge pricing, crowdsourced ODTs are the most cost-effective transit system when the demand is below 3.37 riders/km2/day. With surge pricing applied to crowdsourced ODTs, hybrid systems become the most cost-effective transit solution when demand ranges between 1.18 and 3.37 riders/km2/day. The use of private vehicles is more environmentally sustainable than providing public transit service at all demand levels below 3.37 riders/km2/day. However, the electrification of the public transit fleet along with optimized charging strategies can reduce total yearly GHG emissions by more than 98%. Furthermore, transit systems have similar equity distributions for waiting and in-vehicle travel times.
翻译:过境机构越来越有兴趣以有需求的公交方式取代固定路途过境服务(ODT),然而,这种服务在何时何地有效、在何地是可持续的,目前尚不清楚,为此,我们从整体效率、环境足迹、社会公平和包容的角度,为评估ODT系统的可持续性提供了一个全面框架;拟议的框架通过将这一框架适用于安大略省因尼斯菲勒市加以说明,自2017年以来,在英尼斯菲勒市实施了ODT系统;可以得出这样的结论,即当供应充足且没有激增定价时,众源ODT是最具成本效益的过境系统,而这种服务的需求低于3.37载客/ km2/day;由于对众源ODT采用快速定价,混合系统在1.18至3.37载客/km2/day的需求范围时,成为最具成本效益的过境解决办法;使用私人车辆比在所有需求水平低于3.37载客/km2/day的情况下提供公共过境服务更具环境可持续性;然而,公共过境车队的电气化以及优化收费战略可以减少每年温室气体排放总量,超过98倍。</s>