The focus on privacy-related measures regarding wireless networks grew in last couple of years. This is especially important with technologies like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, which are all around us and our smartphones use them not just for connection to the internet or other devices, but for localization purposes as well. In this paper, we analyze and evaluate probe request frames of 802.11 wireless protocol captured during the 11th international conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN) 2021. We explore the temporal occupancy of the conference space during four days of the conference as well as non-cooperatively track the presence of devices in the proximity of the session rooms using 802.11 management frames, with and without using MAC address randomization. We carried out this analysis without trying to identify/reveal the identity of the users or in any way reverse the MAC address randomization. As a result of the analysis, we detected that there are still many devices not adopting MAC randomization, because either it is not implemented, or users disabled it. In addition, many devices can be easily tracked despite employing MAC randomization.
翻译:过去几年来,对无线网络的隐私措施的关注有所增加,这对我们周围的无线网络或蓝牙等技术特别重要,我们的智能手机不仅用于连接互联网或其他装置,而且用于本地化目的。在本文件中,我们分析和评价了第11次室内定位和室内导航国际会议(IPIN)2021期间所捕捉的802.11个无线协议的查询框架。我们探讨了会议四天期间会议空间的占用时间,以及不合作地跟踪会议室附近使用802.11管理框架的装置的存在,以及不使用MAC地址随机化。我们进行了这项分析,没有试图确定/确认用户身份,也没有以任何方式扭转MAC地址的随机化。通过分析,我们发现仍有许多装置没有采用MAC随机化,因为要么没有实施,要么用户禁用了它。此外,许多装置尽管使用了MAC随机化,仍然很容易跟踪。