Second-order phase field models have emerged as an attractive option for capturing the advection of interfaces in two-phase flows. Prior to these, the state of the art models based on the Cahn-Hilliard equation, which is a fourth order equation, allowed for derivation of surface tension models through thermodynamic arguments. In contrast, the second-order phase field models do not follow a known energy law, and deriving a surface tension term for these models using thermodynamic arguments is not straight-forward. In this work, we justify that the energy-based surface tension model from the Cahn-Hilliard context can be adopted for second-order phase field models as well, and assess its performance. We test the surface tension model on three different second-order phase field equations; the conservative diffuse interface model of Chiu and Lin [1], and two models based on the modified Allen-Cahn equation introduced by Sun and Beckermann [2]. Using canonical tests, we illustrate the lower magnitude of spurious currents, better accuracy, and superior convergence properties of the energy-based surface tension model compared to the continuum surface force (CSF) model, which is a popular choice that is used in conjunction with second order phase field methods. Importantly, in terms of computational expense and parallel efficiency, the energy-based model incurs no penalty compared to the CSF model.
翻译:第二阶阶段的实地模型已成为捕捉两阶段流中界面的对接的有吸引力的选择,在此之前,基于Cahn-Hilliard方程式的先进模型状态,这是第四阶方程式,允许通过热动力学参数衍生表面紧张模型。相比之下,第二阶阶段的实地模型并不遵循已知的能源法,而对这些模型使用热力参数得出的表面紧张术语并不是直向前进的。在这项工作中,我们有理由认为,基于Cahn-Hilliard环境的基于能源的表面紧张模型也可以用于第二阶阶段的实地模型,并评估其性能。我们用三种不同的第二阶级方程式方程式测试地表紧张模型;Chiu和Lin [1] 的保守扩散界面模型,以及基于Sun和Beckermann提出的修改的Allen-Cahn方程式的两种模型[2] 。我们用罐体测试来说明基于能源表面紧张度的模型与连续地面力量模型(CSF)的精确性和高度趋同性组合特性。我们测试了基地表模型(CSF)中所使用的成本计算方法比标准。