This paper provides a systematic and critical review of the economics literature on data as an economic good and draws lessons for data governance. We conclude that focusing on data as an economic good in governance efforts is hardwired to only result in more data production and cannot deliver other societal goals contrary to what is often claimed in the literature and policy. Data governance is often a red herring which distracts from other digital problems. The governance of digital society cannot rely exclusively on data-centric economic models. We review the literatures and the underlying empirical and political claims concerning data commons. While commons thinking is useful to frame digital problems in terms of ecologies, it has important limitations. We propose a political-ecological approach to governing the digital society, defined by ecological thinking about governance problems and the awareness of the political nature of framing the problems and mapping their ecological makeup.
翻译:本文系统性地回顾了数据作为经济商品在经济学领域的文献,并为数据治理提供了经验教训。我们得出结论,将治理努力集中在将数据视为经济商品上是注定会只会导致更多的数据生产,无法实现社会目标,这与文献和政策中经常声称的相反。数据治理常常是一个转移视听的话题,它会分散掉对其他数字问题的注意力。数字社会的治理不能仅仅依赖于数据中心的经济模式。我们回顾了有关数据共享的文献和基于数据共享的经验和政治论点。虽然共享思想用于以生态系统的术语框定数字问题是有用的,但这种思想存在重要的限制。我们提出了一种政治生态学的方法来治理数字社会,该方法通过生态思维来定义治理问题,认识到将问题环境化及在这个背景下映射的生态构成的政治性质。