Visually-aware recommendation on E-commerce platforms aims to leverage visual information of items to predict a user's preference. It is commonly observed that user's attention to visual features does not always reflect the real preference. Although a user may click and view an item in light of a visual satisfaction of their expectations, a real purchase does not always occur due to the unsatisfaction of other essential features (e.g., brand, material, price). We refer to the reason for such a visually related interaction deviating from the real preference as a visual bias. Existing visually-aware models make use of the visual features as a separate collaborative signal similarly to other features to directly predict the user's preference without considering a potential bias, which gives rise to a visually biased recommendation. In this paper, we derive a causal graph to identify and analyze the visual bias of these existing methods. In this causal graph, the visual feature of an item acts as a mediator, which could introduce a spurious relationship between the user and the item. To eliminate this spurious relationship that misleads the prediction of the user's real preference, an intervention and a counterfactual inference are developed over the mediator. Particularly, the Total Indirect Effect is applied for a debiased prediction during the testing phase of the model. This causal inference framework is model agnostic such that it can be integrated into the existing methods. Furthermore, we propose a debiased visually-aware recommender system, denoted as CausalRec to effectively retain the supportive significance of the visual information and remove the visual bias. Extensive experiments are conducted on eight benchmark datasets, which shows the state-of-the-art performance of CausalRec and the efficacy of debiasing.
翻译:有关电子商务平台的视觉认知建议旨在利用项目的视觉信息来预测用户的偏好。 人们普遍认为, 用户对视觉特征的关注并不总是反映真实的偏好。 尽管用户可以根据对其期望的视觉满意度点击和查看某个项目, 但真正的购买并不总是由于其他基本特征(如品牌、材料、价格)的不满意性而发生。 我们把这种与视觉相关的视觉互动与真实偏好脱格的原因称为视觉偏差。 现有的视觉觉悟模型使用视觉特征作为单独的协作信号, 与其他特征相似, 以直接预测用户的偏好, 而不必考虑潜在的偏差, 从而产生视觉偏差的建议。 在本文中, 我们得出一个因果图表, 某个项目的视觉特征作为调解人, 这可能会在用户和项目之间建立一种虚假的关系。 消除这种误导用户真实偏好预测的视觉特征, 一种干预和反直观的预估值 。 在直观测试阶段, 直观的模型和直观的精确度框架显示, 直观的精确度是我们所演的直观判断, 直观的直观的精确度是演度 。