In randomized experiments and observational studies, weighting methods are often used to generalize and transport treatment effect estimates to a target population. Traditional methods construct the weights by separately modeling the treatment assignment and study selection probabilities and then multiplying functions (e.g., inverses) of their estimates. However, these estimated multiplicative weights may not produce adequate covariate balance and can be highly variable, resulting in biased and unstable estimators, especially when there is limited covariate overlap across populations or treatment groups. To address these limitations, we propose a general weighting approach that weights each treatment group towards the target population in a single step. We present a framework and provide a justification for this one-step approach in terms of generic probability distributions. We show a formal connection between our method and inverse probability and inverse odds weighting. By construction, the proposed approach balances covariates and produces stable estimators. We show that our estimator for the target average treatment effect is consistent, asymptotically Normal, multiply robust, and semiparametrically efficient. We demonstrate the performance of this approach using a simulation study and a randomized case study on the effects of physician racial diversity on preventive healthcare utilization among Black men in California.
翻译:在随机的实验和观察研究中,加权方法常常用来对目标人群进行概括化和迁移处理,从而对目标人群进行估计; 传统方法通过分别模拟治疗任务和研究选择概率的概率来构建加权,然后将其估计数的参数(例如反向)乘以; 然而,这些估计的多倍加权可能无法产生适当的共变平衡,而且可能变化很大,造成偏差和不稳定的估算,特别是在不同人群或治疗群体之间平均重叠有限的情况下; 为了解决这些限制,我们建议了一种一般加权方法,将每个治疗群体对目标人群的加权,一个步骤就是加权; 我们提出了一个框架,并为这种一步骤的方法提供了理由,在一般概率分布方面提供了理由; 我们显示了我们的方法与反向概率和反向加权之间的正式联系; 通过构建,拟议的方法平衡并产生稳定的估计值; 我们表明,我们的目标平均治疗效果的估测值是一致的,即正常的、稳健的和半对准的效率。