Classical implementations of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) employ summary statistics to measure the discrepancy among the observed data and the synthetic samples generated from each proposed value of the parameter of interest. However, finding effective summaries is challenging for most of the complex models for which ABC is required. This issue has motivated a growing literature on summary-free versions of ABC that leverage the discrepancy among the empirical distributions of the observed and synthetic data, rather than focusing on selected summaries. The effectiveness of these solutions has led to an increasing interest in the properties of the corresponding ABC posteriors, with a focus on concentration and robustness in asymptotic regimes. Although recent contributions have made key advancements, current theory mostly relies on existence arguments which are not immediate to verify and often yield bounds that are not readily interpretable, thus limiting the methodological implications of theoretical results. In this article we address such aspects by developing a novel unified and constructive framework, based on the concept of Rademacher complexity, to study concentration and robustness of ABC posteriors within the general class of integral probability semimetrics (IPS), that includes routinely-implemented discrepancies such as Wasserstein distance and MMD, and naturally extends classical summary-based ABC. For rejection ABC based on the IPS class, we prove that the theoretical properties of the ABC posterior in terms of concentration and robustness directly relate to the asymptotic behavior of the Rademacher complexity of the class of functions associated to each discrepancy. This result yields a novel understanding of the practical performance of ABC with specific discrepancies, as shown also in empirical studies, and allows to develop new theory guiding ABC calibration.
翻译:古老的Bayesian计算法(ABC)采用简要统计来测量观察到的数据和从每个拟议的利益参数值中产生的合成样本之间的差异。然而,找到有效的摘要对于大多数需要ABC的复杂模型来说都具有挑战性。这个问题促使关于ABC简便版本的文献越来越多,利用了观测和合成数据的经验分配差异,而不是侧重于选定的摘要。这些解决办法的效力导致对相应的ABC后方的特性越来越感兴趣,其重点是无症状制度中的集中性和稳健性。尽管最近的贡献已经取得了关键的指导进步,但目前的理论主要依赖于存在的理由,而这些论点不是立即核查的,而且往往产生不易解释的界限。因此限制了理论结果的方法影响。在本篇文章中,我们处理这些方面的方式是,根据Rademacher的复杂性概念,研究ABC后方的精确度和坚固性,包括以常规理论值为基础的ABC的精确度和精确性值的精确性差,如Asloral-BC的准确性差值,以及BC的精确性值的精确性差值,例如,Aslshestal-BC的距离和M。