We consider the Random Walk Metropolis algorithm on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with Gaussian proposals, and when the target probability measure is the $n$-fold product of a one-dimensional law. It is well known (see Roberts et al. (Ann. Appl. Probab. 7 (1997) 110-120)) that, in the limit $n\to\infty$, starting at equilibrium and for an appropriate scaling of the variance and of the timescale as a function of the dimension $n$, a diffusive limit is obtained for each component of the Markov chain. In Jourdain et al. (Optimal scaling for the transient phase of the random walk Metropolis algorithm: The mean-field limit (2012) Preprint), we generalize this result when the initial distribution is not the target probability measure. The obtained diffusive limit is the solution to a stochastic differential equation nonlinear in the sense of McKean. In the present paper, we prove convergence to equilibrium for this equation. We discuss practical counterparts in order to optimize the variance of the proposal distribution to accelerate convergence to equilibrium. Our analysis confirms the interest of the constant acceptance rate strategy (with acceptance rate between $1/4$ and $1/3$) first suggested in Roberts et al. (Ann. Appl. Probab. 7 (1997) 110-120). We also address scaling of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm. When starting at equilibrium, a diffusive limit for an optimal scaling of the variance is obtained in Roberts and Rosenthal (J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Stat. Methodol. 60 (1998) 255-268). In the transient case, we obtain formally that the optimal variance scales very differently in $n$ depending on the sign of a moment of the distribution, which vanishes at equilibrium. This suggest that it is difficult to derive practical recommendations for MALA from such asymptotic results.
翻译:我们用高斯的提议,将“漫步大都会”的随机运算算算法($\ mathbb{R ⁇ n)与Gausian 提案放在一起,当目标概率度量为一维法律的美元值乘以美元乘以美元。众所周知(见Roberts et al. (Ann. Appl. 7 Probab. (1997-110-120))),在“美元乘以平衡,并适当调整差异和时间标度,作为维度的函数。在“马尔科夫”链的每个组成部分都获得了“硬度限制”。在 Jourdain 等人 中,(Officealdalblog) 用于随机行运算的“美元乘以美元乘以美元乘以美元乘以美元乘以一维值乘以。在“正比值”中,我们概括了这个结果。在“正比值”中,“我们得到的 diffuseral liction” 是“我们从738 获得的“非线性差” 的解决方案。在本文中,我们证明“正和“平衡” 。我们讨论实际对应,我们讨论“等点”是为了在“美元调化”中,以便在“美元乘以“正价调取一个“美元乘以“美元乘以“正值”的比值”的“正价调值”的“美元乘以“正价调”的“美元”的比”的“美元”的“美元乘以“美元乘以“正值”的比”的比” 。