COVID-19 Prevention, which combines the soft approaches and best practices for public health safety, is the only recommended solution from the health science and management society side considering the pandemic era. In an attempt to evaluate the validity of such claims in a conflict and COVID-19-affected country like Afghanistan, we conducted a large-scale digital social experiment using conversational AI and social platforms from an info-epidemiology and an infoveillance perspective. This served as a means to uncover an underling truth, give large-scale facilitation support, extend the soft impact of discussion to multiple sites, collect, diverge, converge and evaluate a large amount of opinions and concerns from health experts, patients and local people, deliberate on the data collected and explore collective prevention approaches of COVID-19. Finally, this paper shows that deciding a prevention measure that maximizes the probability of finding the ground truth is intrinsically difficult without utilizing the support of an AI-enabled discussion systems.
翻译:COVID-19预防工作结合了公共卫生安全的软办法和最佳做法,是卫生科学和管理社会方面考虑到这一流行病时代的唯一建议解决办法,为了评估这种主张在阿富汗这样的冲突和受COVID-19影响的国家的有效性,我们从信息流行病学和信息传播的角度,利用谈话性人工智能和社会平台,进行了大规模的数字社会实验,作为发现一个不切实际的真理、提供大规模便利支持、将讨论的软影响扩大到多个地点、收集、分歧、汇集和评价卫生专家、病人和当地人民的大量意见和关切、审议所收集的数据并探索COVID-19的集体预防方法的手段。 最后,本文表明,如果不利用由AI支持的讨论系统,那么决定一个尽可能挖掘地面真相的预防措施就必然困难。