In today's online advertising markets, it is common for an advertiser to set a long-period budget. Correspondingly, advertising platforms adopt budget control methods to ensure that an advertiser's payment is within her budget. Most budget control methods rely on the value distributions of advertisers. However, the platform hardly learns their true priors due to the complex environment advertisers stand in and privacy issues. Therefore, it is essential to understand how budget control auction mechanisms perform under unassured priors. This work answers this problem from multiple aspects. Specifically, we discuss five budget-constrained parameterized mechanisms: bid-discount/pacing first-price auctions, the Bayesian revenue-optimal auction and bid-discount/pacing second-price auctions. We consider the game among the seller and all buyers induced by these five mechanisms in the stochastic model. We restrict the discussion to efficient mechanisms in which the seller earns buyers' budgets sufficiently, and thus, leads to his high revenue. Our main result shows the strategic equivalence between the Bayesian revenue-optimal mechanism and the efficient bid-discount first-price mechanism. A broad equivalence among all these (efficient) mechanisms is also given in the symmetric case. We further dig into the structural properties of stochastic budget-constrained mechanisms. We characterize sufficient and necessary conditions on the efficient parameter tuple for bid-discount/pacing first-price auctions. Meanwhile, when buyers do not take strategic behaviors, we exploit the dominance relationships of these mechanisms by revealing their intrinsic structures.
翻译:在今天的在线广告市场中,广告商通常会设定长期预算。因此,广告商通常会采用预算控制方法,以确保广告商的付款在其预算范围内。大多数预算控制方法都依赖广告商的价值分配。然而,由于复杂的环境广告商所处的环境以及隐私问题,该平台几乎无法了解其真正的前科。因此,必须了解预算控制拍卖机制如何在未加保证的前期运作。这项工作从多个方面解决了这一问题。具体地说,我们讨论了五个预算限制的参数化机制:投标-折扣/第一价格拍卖的间隔、巴伊西亚收入-最佳拍卖和投标-折扣/第二价格拍卖的间隔。我们认为,由于这五个机制的复杂环境广告商和隐私问题,销售商很难了解其真正的前期交易机制是如何运作的。我们的主要结果显示,巴伊西亚收入-最佳机制与第一价格拍卖商首期拍卖商之间的战略等值,而高效的标价-标价交易机制则是我们所必要的先期定价机制。