AI's rapid growth has been felt acutely by scholarly venues, leading to growing pains within the peer review process. These challenges largely center on the inability of specific subareas to identify and evaluate work that is appropriate according to criteria relevant to each subcommunity as determined by stakeholders of that subarea. We set forth a proposal that re-focuses efforts within these subcommunities through a decentralization of the reviewing and publication process. Through this re-centering effort, we hope to encourage each subarea to confront the issues specific to their process of academic publication and incentivization. This model has historically been successful for several subcommunities in AI, and we highlight those instances as examples for how the broader field can continue to evolve despite its continually growing size.
翻译:学术场所对大赦国际的迅速增长有着深刻的感知,这导致同行审评进程越来越痛苦。这些挑战主要集中于具体子领域无法根据该子领域利益攸关方确定的与每个子社区相关的标准确定和评估适当的工作。我们提出了一项提案,通过审查和出版过程的权力下放,在这些次社区内重新集中努力。我们希望通过这一再集中努力,鼓励每个子领域面对其学术出版和激励过程中的具体问题。这一模式历来在AI中的若干次社区中是成功的,我们强调这些实例,说明尽管范围不断扩大,但更广泛的领域如何继续发展。