Image forensics aims to detect the manipulation of digital images. Currently, splicing detection, copy-move detection and image retouching detection are drawing much attentions from researchers. However, image editing techniques develop with time goes by. One emerging image editing technique is colorization, which can colorize grayscale images with realistic colors. Unfortunately, this technique may also be intentionally applied to certain images to confound object recognition algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, no forensic technique has yet been invented to identify whether an image is colorized. We observed that, compared to natural images, colorized images, which are generated by three state-of-the-art methods, possess statistical differences for the hue and saturation channels. Besides, we also observe statistical inconsistencies in the dark and bright channels, because the colorization process will inevitably affect the dark and bright channel values. Based on our observations, i.e., potential traces in the hue, saturation, dark and bright channels, we propose two simple yet effective detection methods for fake colorized images: Histogram based Fake Colorized Image Detection (FCID-HIST) and Feature Encoding based Fake Colorized Image Detection (FCID-FE). Experimental results demonstrate that both proposed methods exhibit a decent performance against multiple state-of-the-art colorization approaches.
翻译:图像法证旨在检测对数字图像的操纵。 目前, 分层检测、 复制移动检测和图像重新触摸检测正在吸引研究人员的注意。 然而, 图像编辑技术随着时间的流逝而发展。 正在形成的图像编辑技术是色彩化, 它可以将灰色图像与现实颜色相色。 不幸的是, 这一技术也可能被有意应用到某些图像中, 以混淆天体识别算法 。 根据我们的知识, 目前还没有发明任何法医技术来确定图像是否具有色化。 我们观察到, 与自然图像相比, 彩色化图像( 由三种最先进的方法生成 ), 图像编辑技术随着时间的流逝而发展。 此外, 我们还在暗色化和亮色的频道中看到统计不一致, 因为彩色化过程将不可避免地影响黑暗和亮色的频道值。 根据我们的观察, 也就是说, 光度、 饱和 、 深色和亮的频道, 我们提出了两种简单而有效的检测假彩色图像的方法: 以暗色图像检测为基础, 彩色图像检测( FCIC- FIC- FIC- Forizaling) 两种方法, 显示基于的彩色测试。