Machine learning assisted optimal power flow (OPF) aims to reduce the computational complexity of these non-linear and non-convex constrained optimisation problems by consigning expensive (online) optimisation to offline training. The majority of work in this area typically employs fully-connected neural networks (FCNN). However, recently convolutional (CNN) and graph (GNN) neural networks have been also investigated, in effort to exploit topological information within the power grid. Although promising results have been obtained, there lacks a systematic comparison between these architectures throughout literature. Accordingly, we assess the performance of a variety of FCNN, CNN and GNN models for two fundamental approaches to machine learning assisted OPF: regression (predicting optimal generator set-points) and classification (predicting the active set of constraints). For several synthetic grids with interconnected utilities, we show that locality properties between feature and target variables are scarce, hence find limited merit of harnessing topological information in NN models for this set of problems.
翻译:机器学习协助的最佳电流(OPF)旨在降低这些非线性和非电流限制优化的计算复杂性,将昂贵的(在线)优化派给离线培训,这一领域的大部分工作通常使用完全连接的神经网络(FCNN),然而,最近对革命性(CNN)和图(GNN)神经网络进行了调查,以努力利用电网中的地形信息。虽然已经取得了可喜的成果,但在整个文献中这些结构之间缺乏系统比较。因此,我们评估了各种FCNN、CNN和GNN模式的绩效,以两种基本方法进行机器学习的辅助OPFF:回归(预设最佳发电机定点)和分类(预设积极制约组合 ) 。 对于几个与连接的功能合成电网,我们表明地貌变量和目标变量之间的地貌特性很少,因此发现利用NN模型的地形信息解决这组问题的好处有限。