Thanks to the increasing availability in computing power, high-dimensional engineering problems seem to be at reach. But the curse of dimensionality will always prevent us to try out extensively all the hypotheses. There is a vast literature on efficient methods to construct a Design of Experiments (DoE) such as low discrepancy sequences and optimized designs. Classically, the performance of these methods is assessed using a discrepancy metric. Having a fast discrepancy measure is of prime importance if ones want to optimize a design. This work proposes a new methodology to assess the quality of a random sampling by using a flavor of Newcomb-Benford's law. The performance of the new metric is compared to classical discrepancy measures and showed to offer similar information at a fraction of the computational cost of traditional discrepancy measures.
翻译:由于计算能力日益普及,高维工程问题似乎正在接近。但是,由于维度的诅咒,我们总是无法广泛尝试所有假设。关于构建实验设计(DoE)的有效方法有大量文献,例如低差异序列和优化设计。典型地说,这些方法的性能是用差异度量来评估的。如果想优化设计,快速差异度量至关重要。这项工作提出了一个新方法,用纽科布-本福德法则的味道来评估随机抽样的质量。新指标的性能与传统差异度量量度的典型度量作比较,并显示以传统差异度量量量量的计算成本的一小部分提供类似信息。