Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) or drones play many roles in a modern smart city such as the delivery of goods, mapping real-time road traffic and monitoring pollution. The ability of drones to perform these functions often requires the support of machine learning technology. However, traditional machine learning models for drones encounter data privacy problems, communication costs and energy limitations. Federated Learning, an emerging distributed machine learning approach, is an excellent solution to address these issues. Federated learning (FL) allows drones to train local models without transmitting raw data. However, existing FL requires a central server to aggregate the trained model parameters of the UAV. A failure of the central server can significantly impact the overall training. In this paper, we propose two aggregation methods: Commutative FL and Alternate FL, based on the existing architecture of decentralised Federated Learning for UAV Networks (DFL-UN) by adding a unique aggregation method of decentralised FL. Those two methods can effectively control energy consumption and communication cost by controlling the number of local training epochs, local communication, and global communication. The simulation results of the proposed training methods are also presented to verify the feasibility and efficiency of the architecture compared with two benchmark methods (e.g. standard machine learning training and standard single aggregation server training). The simulation results show that the proposed methods outperform the benchmark methods in terms of operational stability, energy consumption and communication cost.
翻译:摘要:无人机或无人机在现代智能城市中扮演着多种角色,如货物运送,实时道路交通地图制作和污染监测。 无人机执行这些功能的能力通常需要机器学习技术的支持。然而,传统的无人机机器学习模型遇到数据隐私问题,通信成本和能源限制。联邦学习(Federated Learning),一种新兴分布式机器学习方法,是解决这些问题的最佳方法。联邦学习(FL)允许无人机在不传输原始数据的情况下训练本地模型。然而,现有的FL需要一个中央服务器来聚合无人机的训练模型参数。中央服务器的故障可能会严重影响整个训练。在本文中,我们提出了两种聚合方法:累加式联邦学习和交替式联邦学习,基于现有的去中心化无人机网络联邦学习架构(DFL-UN),通过添加分散式的联邦学习来实现独特的聚合方法,有效地通过控制本地训练时期数,本地通信和全局通信来控制能量消耗和通信成本。文中还列举了所提出的训练方法的模拟结果,以验证与两种基准方法(标准机器学习训练和标准单个聚合服务器训练)相比,架构的可行性和效率。模拟结果表明,所提出的方法在操作稳定性,能量消耗和通信成本方面优于基准方法。