The differential network (DN) analysis identifies changes in measures of association among genes under two or more experimental conditions. In this article, we introduce a Pseudo-value Regression Approach for Network Analysis (PRANA). This is a novel method of differential network analysis that also adjusts for additional clinical covariates. We start from mutual information (MI) criteria, followed by pseudo-value calculations, which are then entered into a robust regression model. This article assesses the model performances of PRANA in a multivariable setting, followed by a comparison to dnapath and DINGO in both univariable and multivariable settings through variety of simulations. Performance in terms of precision, recall, and F1 score of differentially connected (DC) genes is assessed. By and large, PRANA outperformed dnapath and DINGO, neither of which is equipped to adjust for available covariates such as patient-age. Lastly, we employ PRANA in a real data application from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to identify DC genes that are associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate its utility. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt of utilizing a regression modeling for DN analysis by collective gene expression levels between two or more groups with the inclusion of additional clinical covariates. By and large, adjusting for available covariates improves accuracy of a DN analysis.
翻译:差异网络分析(DN) 差异网络分析(DN) 发现在两个或两个以上实验条件下基因之间关联度的变化。 在本条中,我们引入了网络分析Pseudo-value Regrestition 方法(PRANA) 。这是一种新型的差别网络分析方法,该方法也适应更多的临床共变。我们从相互信息标准(MI)开始,然后是伪值计算,然后输入一个强大的回归模型。本文章评估了PRANA在多变环境中的模型性能,随后通过多种模拟,在不可变和多变的环境中与dnaNGO进行比较。从精确性、回溯和F1分差异连接(DC)基因的成绩上进行评估。基本上,PRANA优于其他的dnapath and DINGO, 后者既不能适应现有的共变数模式,例如耐心。最后,我们用PRANA在GeneExmal Ombus(GEGE) 数据库中的一种真实数据应用中,以识别与长期阻碍性临床图解(C)相关的DC基因的精度分析相关基因, 也能够利用这一良性模型的共变化分析。