Social media has been a paramount arena for election campaigns for political actors. While many studies have been paying attention to the political campaigns related to partisanship, politicians also can conduct different campaigns according to their chances of winning. Leading candidates, for example, do not behave the same as fringe candidates in their elections, and vice versa. We, however, know little about this difference in social media political campaign strategies according to their odds in elections. We tackle this problem by analyzing candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. Our study finds that, as their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with, from people in general to the electrical districts and specific persons (verified accounts or accounts with many followers). Our study brings new insights into the candidates' campaign strategies through the analysis based on the novel perspective of the candidate's electoral situation.
翻译:社交媒体已成为政治人物竞选活动的重要领域。虽然许多研究关注党派问题相关的政治竞选,但政治人物也可以根据获胜的机会进行不同的竞选活动。例如,领先的候选人在竞选中的表现并不像边缘候选人那么一致,反之亦然。然而,基于候选人选情的社交媒体政治竞选策略的差异尚未完全被研究,我们对此知之甚少。本研究通过分析候选人的推文,从用户、话题和回复情感方面,解决了这个问题。我们的研究发现,随着候选人获胜机会的增加,他们的目标观众也逐渐从普通大众转向具体的选区和特定的人(验证账户或粉丝数量较多的账户)。我们的研究通过新颖的候选人选情视角分析竞选策略,为我们带来了新的启示。