Upper-extremity amputees who use myoelectric prostheses currently lack the haptic sensory information needed to perform dexterous activities of daily living. While considerable research has focused on restoring this haptic information, these approaches often rely on single-modality feedback schemes which are necessary but insufficient for the feedforward and feedback control strategies employed by the central nervous system. Multi-modality feedback approaches have been gaining attention in several application domains, however, the utility for myoelectric prosthesis use remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the utility of dual-modality haptic feedback in a virtual EMG-controlled grasp-and-hold task with a brittle object and variable load force. We recruited N=20 non-amputee participants to perform the task in four conditions: no feedback, vibration feedback of incipient slip, squeezing feedback of grip force, and dual (vibration + squeezing) feedback of incipient slip and grip force. Results suggest that receiving any feedback is better than receiving none, however, dual-modality feedback is far superior to either single-modality feedback approach in terms of preventing the object from breaking or dropping, even after it started slipping. Control with dual-modality feedback was also seen as more intuitive than with either of the single-modality feedback approaches.
翻译:使用流电假肢的中上方截肢者目前缺乏开展日常活动所需的简便感官信息。虽然大量研究的重点是恢复这种偶然性信息,但这些方法往往依赖单一模式反馈计划,而这种计划对于中枢神经系统采用的进料和反馈控制战略来说是必要的,但并不足够。多模式反馈方法在一些应用领域日益受到注意,但是,用于使用流电假肢的实用性仍然不明确。在这项研究中,我们调查了双模式临时反馈在虚拟EMG控制的掌握和保持上方物体和可变负载力量的掌握任务中的有用性。我们聘用了N=20非模版参与者在四个条件下执行这项任务:没有反馈,初始滑动的振动反馈,握力的反馈,以及初始滑动和拉力的双重(振动+挤动)反馈。结果显示,接收任何反馈比接收任何反馈都好,然而,双模式反馈比防止双重模式或双重模式反馈在单一模式后开始的双模式反馈,从单一模式反馈中开始,也远远优于单一模式反馈。