When applied to contingency tables, dual scaling and correspondence are mathematically equivalent methods. For the analysis of rating data, however, the methods differ. To a large extent this is due to differences in preprocessing of the data. In particular, in dual scaling, ratings are either transformed to rank order, or to successive category data before applying a customised dual scaling approach. In correspondence analysis, on the other hand, a so-called doubling of the original ratings is applied before applying the usual correspondence analysis formulas. In this paper, we consider these differences in detail. We propose a dual scaling variant that can be applied directly to the ratings and we compare theoretical as well as practical properties of the different approaches.
翻译:在应用应急表时,双重比例和对应方法在数学上是等同的。但是,在分析评级数据时,方法不同,这在很大程度上是由于数据预处理前的差异,特别是,在双重比例方面,评级在采用定制的双重比例方法之前,要么转换为排名顺序,要么依次分类数据。另一方面,在对对应分析中,在应用通常的对应分析公式之前,先采用所谓的原评级翻番。我们在本文件中详细考虑了这些差异。我们提出了一个可直接适用于评级的双重比例变量,并比较不同方法的理论和实践特性。