The work provides an exhaustive comparison of some representative families of topology optimization methods for 3D structural optimization, such as the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP), the Level-set, the Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization (BESO), and the Variational Topology Optimization (VARTOP) methods. The main differences and similarities of these approaches are then highlighted from an algorithmic standpoint. The comparison is carried out via the study of a set of numerical benchmark cases using industrial-like fine-discretization meshes (around 1 million finite elements), and Matlab as the common computational platform, to ensure fair comparisons. Then, the results obtained for every benchmark case with the different methods are compared in terms of computational cost, topology quality, achieved minimum value of the objective function, and robustness of the computations (convergence in objective function and topology). Finally, some quantitative and qualitative results are presented, from which, an attempt of qualification of the methods, in terms of their relative performance, is done.
翻译:这项工作对三维结构优化的一些有代表性的地形优化方法进行了详尽的比较,例如:Solid Istotrotic Macific Pritics with Crimination(SIMP),等级设置,双向进化结构优化(BESO),以及变化式地形优化(VARTOP)方法。然后从算法的角度强调了这些方法的主要差异和相似之处。比较是通过研究一组数字基准案例进行的,这些案例使用工业类微分化杂质(约100万个限定元素)和马特拉布作为共同计算平台,以确保公平比较。然后,对使用不同方法的每一个基准案例所取得的结果进行了计算成本、表层质量、客观功能达到的最低价值和计算稳健性(客观功能和表层的一致)等比较。最后,介绍了一些定量和定性结果,从这些结果中尝试了方法的相对性能的定性。