A wide variety of battery models are available, and it is not always obvious which model `best' describes a dataset. This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach using Bayesian quadrature. The model evidence is adopted as the selection metric, choosing the simplest model that describes the data, in the spirit of Occam's razor. However, estimating this requires integral computations over parameter space, which is usually prohibitively expensive. Bayesian quadrature offers sample-efficient integration via model-based inference that minimises the number of battery model evaluations. The posterior distribution of model parameters can also be inferred as a byproduct without further computation. Here, the simplest lithium-ion battery models, equivalent circuit models, were used to analyse the sensitivity of the selection criterion to given different datasets and model configurations. We show that popular model selection criteria, such as root-mean-square error and Bayesian information criterion, can fail to select a parsimonious model in the case of a multimodal posterior. The model evidence can spot the optimal model in such cases, simultaneously providing the variance of the evidence inference itself as an indication of confidence. We also show that Bayesian quadrature can compute the evidence faster than popular Monte Carlo based solvers.
翻译:各种电池模型可用,但往往不清楚哪个模型“最佳”描述了数据集。本文提出了一种利用贝叶斯四元数法进行贝叶斯模型选择的方法。模型证据被采用为选择量度,选择能够描述数据的最简单模型,符合奥卡姆剃刀的思想。然而,估计模型证据需要在参数空间上进行积分计算,这通常是不可行的。贝叶斯四元数法通过基于模型的推断提供了样本高效的积分,最小化了电池模型能量的评价次数。和自由计算相比,也许可以副产参数的后验分布。在本文中,最简单的锂离子电池模型,等效电路模型,被用于分析不同数据集和模型配置对选择标准的灵敏度。我们发现,根据均方根误差和贝叶斯信息准则等流行的模型选择准则,在多峰后验的情况下容易无法选择简洁的模型。模型证据可以在这种情况下发现最佳模型,并同时提供证据推断方差本身作为置信度指标。我们还展示了贝叶斯四元数法可以比流行的基于蒙特卡洛的求解器更快地计算证据。