Using cumulative residual processes, we propose joint goodness-of-fit tests for conditional means and variances functions in the context of nonlinear time series with martingale difference innovations. The main challenge comes from the fact the cumulative residual process no longer admits, under the null hypothesis, a distribution-free limit. To obtain a practical solution one either transforms the process in order to achieve a distribution-free limit or approximates the non-distribution free limit using a numerical or a re-sampling technique. Here the three solutions will be considered.It is shown that the proposed tests have nontrivial power against a class of root-n local alternatives, and are suitable when the conditioning information set is infinite-dimensional, which allows including models like autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic stochastic models with dependent innovations. The approach presented assumes only certain conditions on the first- and second-order conditional moments, without imposing any autoregression model. The test procedures introduced are compared with each other and with other competitors in terms of their power using a simulation study and a real data application. These simulations have shown that the statistical powers of tests based on re-sampling or numerical approximation of the original statistics are in general slightly better than those based on a martingale transformation of the original process.
翻译:使用累积剩余过程,我们提议在非线性时间序列的背景下,用马丁加尔差异创新,对有条件手段和差异功能进行联合的优待测试,主要挑战来自以下事实:累积剩余过程不再承认在无效假设下无分配限制;为了获得实际解决办法,要么利用数字或再抽样技术,为实现无分配限制或近似非分配自由限制,而采用数字或再抽样技术,对有条件手段和差异功能进行联合的优待测试。这里将考虑三种解决办法。这三种办法。它表明,拟议的测试对一类根级当地替代方法没有边际能力,当调节信息组是无限的,允许将自动递减性、条件性偏差和有依赖性创新模式等模型纳入其中。提出的方法仅假设第一和第二级条件条件下的某些条件,而不强加任何自动回归模式。引入的测试程序将相互比较,并与其他竞争者使用模拟研究和真实数据应用的实力进行对比。这些模拟显示,基于原始数据转换的统计能力比原始的原始数字或图示性更强。