In car-body production the pre-formed sheet metal parts of the body are assembled on fully-automated production lines. The body passes through multiple stations in succession, and is processed according to the order requirements. The timely completion of orders depends on the individual station-based operations concluding within their scheduled cycle times. If an error occurs in one station, it can have a knock-on effect, resulting in delays on the downstream stations. To the best of our knowledge, there exist no methods for automatically distinguishing between source and knock-on errors in this setting, as well as establishing a causal relation between them. Utilizing real-time information about conditions collected by a production data acquisition system, we propose a novel vehicle manufacturing analysis system, which uses deep learning to establish a link between source and knock-on errors. We benchmark three sequence-to-sequence models, and introduce a novel composite time-weighted action metric for evaluating models in this context. We evaluate our framework on a real-world car production dataset recorded by Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles. Surprisingly we find that 71.68% of sequences contain either a source or knock-on error. With respect to seq2seq model training, we find that the Transformer demonstrates a better performance compared to LSTM and GRU in this domain, in particular when the prediction range with respect to the durations of future actions is increased.
翻译:在汽车机体生产中,先成的金属板部件组装在完全自动化的生产线上。身体连续通过多个站点,并按照订单要求处理。订单的及时完成取决于每个站点在预定周期内完成的操作。如果一个站点发生错误,它可能会产生敲击效应,导致下游站的延误。据我们所知,我们没有办法自动区分这一环境的源和敲击错误,以及建立它们之间的因果关系。利用生产数据采集系统所收集的条件的实时信息,我们建议一个新型的车辆制造分析系统,该系统利用深度学习来建立源与敲击错误之间的联系。我们为三个站点设定了三个顺序到顺序模型的基准,并引入了一种新的复合时间加权行动衡量标准,用于评估下游站的模型。我们根据我们的知识,在伏尔克元商用车辆所记录的真实世界汽车生产数据集上,我们发现71.68%的序列含有更好的源或敲击错误,我们发现了一个新型的车辆制造分析系统,它利用深度学习来建立源与敲击错误之间的联系。我们用后期的模型来显示未来在变后期中,我们发现,在变后期中发现,变后期中会显示,变后期中会显示,变后期是变后期,变后变后期是变后变后期。