Information aggregation is a vital tool for human and machine decision making, especially in the presence of noise and uncertainty. Traditionally, approaches to aggregation broadly diverge into two categories, those which attribute a worth or weight to information sources and those which attribute said worth to the evidence arising from said sources. The latter is pervasive in particular in the physical sciences, underpinning linear order statistics and enabling non-linear aggregation. The former is popular in the social sciences, providing interpretable insight on the sources. Thus far, limited work has sought to integrate both approaches, applying either approach to a different degree. In this paper, we put forward an approach which integrates--rather than partially applies--both approaches, resulting in a novel joint weighted averaging operator. We show how this operator provides a systematic approach to integrating a priori beliefs about the worth of both source and evidence by leveraging compositional geometry--producing results unachievable by traditional operators. We conclude and highlight the potential of the operator across disciplines, from machine learning to psychology.
翻译:信息汇总是人类和机器决策的一个重要工具,特别是在出现噪音和不确定性的情况下。传统上,信息汇总是人类和机器决策的重要工具,在传统上,将两种方法混为一谈的方法大相径庭,一种是赋予信息来源价值或份量,另一种是赋予信息来源价值或份量,另一种是赋予由上述来源产生的证据的,后者在物理科学中尤为普遍,支持线性顺序统计,使非线性汇总成为可能。前者在社会科学中很受欢迎,对来源提供了可解释的洞察力。迄今为止,在将两种方法结合起来方面所做的工作有限,在不同的程度上适用两种方法。在本文件中,我们提出了一种将两种方法结合起来的方法,而不是部分地适用两种方法,结果产生了一个新的共同加权平均操作者。我们展示了该操作者如何通过利用传统操作者无法实现的构成性几何测结果,系统地整合关于源值和证据的先入为主的信念。我们得出结论并强调了操作者从机器学习到心理学的跨学科的潜力。