Real-world face recognition applications often deal with suboptimal image quality or resolution due to different capturing conditions such as various subject-to-camera distances, poor camera settings, or motion blur. This characteristic has an unignorable effect on performance. Recent cross-resolution face recognition approaches used simple, arbitrary, and unrealistic down- and up-scaling techniques to measure robustness against real-world edge-cases in image quality. Thus, we propose a new standardized benchmark dataset derived from the famous Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW). In contrast to previous derivatives, which focus on pose, age, similarity, and adversarial attacks, our Cross-Quality Labeled Faces in the Wild (XQLFW) dataset maximizes the quality difference. It contains only more realistic synthetically degraded images when necessary. Our proposed dataset is then used to further investigate the influence of image quality on several state-of-the-art approaches. With XQLFW, we show that these models perform differently in cross-quality cases, and hence, the generalizing capability is not accurately predicted by their performance on LFW. Additionally, we report baseline accuracy with recent deep learning models explicitly trained for cross-resolution applications and evaluate the susceptibility to image quality. To encourage further research in cross-resolution face recognition and incite the assessment of image quality robustness, we publish the database and code for evaluation.
翻译:现实世界的面部识别应用程序往往涉及低于最佳的图像质量或分辨率,原因是不同的捕获条件,如不同的对象到相机距离、摄像环境差或运动模糊。这一特征对性能产生了不可比拟的影响。最近的跨分辨率面部识别方法使用了简单、任意和不切实际的下层和上层缩放技术,以测量图像质量中真实世界边框的稳健性。因此,我们提出了一个新的标准化基准数据集,该数据集来自著名的野生标签面(LFW),与以往的衍生工具不同,前者侧重于面部、年龄、相似性和对抗性攻击。与此相反,我们在野生(XQLFW)的交叉质量标签面部数据集中,其质量差异最大。它只包含更现实的合成退化图像。随后,我们提议的数据集被用于进一步调查图像质量对一些最先进的方法的影响。我们用XQLFW, 显示这些模型在交叉质量案例中的表现不同,因此,其总体能力没有准确性被其表现精确地预测。此外,我们用经过培训的精确度数据库,以进一步的精确度来学习最新质量评估。