Left-wing authoritarianism remains far less understood than right-wing authoritarianism. We contribute to the literature on the former, which typically relies on surveys, using a new social media analytics approach. We use a list of 60 terms to provide an exploratory sketch of the outlines of a political ideology (tribal equalitarianism) with origins in 19th and 20th century social philosophy. We then use analyses of the English Corpus of Google Books (over 8 million books) and scraped unique tweets from Twitter (n = 202,852) to conduct a series of investigations to discern the extent to which this ideology is cohesive amongst the public, reveals signatures of authoritarianism and has been growing in popularity. Though exploratory, our results provide some evidence of left-wing authoritarianism in two forms (1) a uniquely conservative moral signature amongst ostensible liberals using measures from Moral Foundations Theory and (2) a substantial prevalence of anger, relative to anxiety or sadness. In general, results indicate that this worldview is growing in popularity, is increasingly cohesive, and shows signatures of authoritarianism.
翻译:左翼专制主义仍远不如右翼专制主义。 我们为前者的文献贡献了大量资料,这些文献通常依靠调查,采用新的社交媒体分析方法。 我们用60个术语列表提供源自19世纪和20世纪社会哲学的政治意识形态(部落平等主义)轮廓的探索性草图,我们然后利用对谷歌书籍的英国Corpus的分析(800多万本书)和Twitter上独特的推文(n=202,852)进行一系列调查,以辨别这一意识形态在公众中具有凝聚力的程度,揭示了专制主义的特征,并越来越受欢迎。 尽管我们的成果具有探索性,但以两种形式提供了左翼专制主义的一些证据:(1) 一种独特的保守的道德标志,使用来自道德基金会理论的措施,以及(2) 与焦虑或悲伤相关的大量愤怒。 总的来说,结果显示这种世界观越来越受欢迎,越来越紧密,并显示出专制主义的标志。