In regression discontinuity designs, manipulation threatens identification. A known channel of harmful manipulations is precise control over the observed assignment, but this channel is only an example. This study uncovers the only other channel: sample selection by deciding manipulation precisely based on the given assignment status. For example, in the assignment design of a qualification exam, self-selection by allowing test retakes precisely based on failing the exam is a precise decision. This precise decision harms identification without precisely controlling the final assignment. For instance, retaking the test never ensures passage, but it distorts the qualification assignment because some students that failed then pass. However, students that have already passed, never fail. This novel channel redefines the justification for identification. Furthermore, under a new auxiliary condition, McCrary (2008)'s test is able to confirm identification and the existing worst-case bounds are nested within our new bounds. In a replication study, another sample selection by analysts appears critical in the robustness of their original conclusion.
翻译:在回归不连续设计中,操纵威胁到识别。已知的有害操纵渠道是对观察到的任务的精确控制,但这一渠道只是一个例子。本研究揭示了其他唯一的渠道:通过精确根据特定任务状态决定操纵来选择样本。例如,在资格考试的指定设计中,允许测试完全根据考试失败进行重新获取的自我选择是一个精确的决定。这种精确的决定在不精确控制最终任务的情况下会损害识别。例如,重新测试永远无法确保通过,但它扭曲了资格分配,因为有些学生已经过关。然而,学生已经过关,永远不会失败。这个新渠道重新定义了身份识别的理由。此外,在一个新的辅助条件下,Mccharary(2008年)的测试能够确认身份,而现有的最坏的界限被嵌入我们的新界限。在一项复制研究中,分析员的另一个抽样选择在其最初结论的稳健度中显得至关重要。