Many neural-based recommender systems were proposed in recent years and part of them used Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) to model user-item interactions. However, the exploration of Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) on recommendation has received relatively less scrutiny. In this paper, we focus on two questions: 1- Can we successfully apply WGAN-GP on recommendation and does this approach give an advantage compared to the best GAN models? 2- Are GAN-based recommender systems relevant? To answer the first question, we propose a recommender system based on WGAN-GP called CFWGAN-GP which is founded on a previous model (CFGAN). We successfully applied our method on real-world datasets on the top-k recommendation task and the empirical results show that it is competitive with state-of-the-art GAN approaches, but we found no evidence of significant advantage of using WGAN-GP instead of the original GAN, at least from the accuracy point of view. As for the second question, we conduct a simple experiment in which we show that a well-tuned conceptually simpler method outperforms GAN-based models by a considerable margin, questioning the use of such models.
翻译:近年来提出了许多以神经为基础的建议系统,其中部分系统使用General Adversarial Networks(GAN)来模拟用户-项目的互动。然而,根据建议对瓦塞尔斯坦GAN与梯度惩罚(WGAN-GP)的探索相对没有那么仔细。在本文件中,我们侧重于两个问题:1——我们能否成功应用WGAN-GP的建议,这一方法是否比最好的GAN模型具有优势?2-GAN基于GAN的建议系统具有相关性?为了回答第一个问题,我们提出了一个基于WGAN-GP的称为CFWGAN-GP的建议系统,这个系统是以以前的模型(CFGAN)为基础的。我们成功地将我们的方法应用于现实世界数据集的顶级建议任务和实证结果显示,它与最先进的GAN方法具有竞争力,但我们没有发现任何证据表明使用WGAN-GGGGP有重大优势,至少从精确的角度来看是如此。关于第二个问题,我们进行了简单的实验,我们用这种模型展示了一种非常简单的概念模型,我们用了一个非常简单的模型来示范。