Since its beginning in the 1950s, the field of artificial intelligence has cycled several times between periods of optimistic predictions and massive investment ("AI spring") and periods of disappointment, loss of confidence, and reduced funding ("AI winter"). Even with today's seemingly fast pace of AI breakthroughs, the development of long-promised technologies such as self-driving cars, housekeeping robots, and conversational companions has turned out to be much harder than many people expected. One reason for these repeating cycles is our limited understanding of the nature and complexity of intelligence itself. In this paper I describe four fallacies in common assumptions made by AI researchers, which can lead to overconfident predictions about the field. I conclude by discussing the open questions spurred by these fallacies, including the age-old challenge of imbuing machines with humanlike common sense.
翻译:自1950年代开始以来,人工智能领域在乐观预测和大规模投资(“AI 春天 ” ) 和失望、信心丧失和资金减少(“AI 冬季 ” ) 之间循环了好几次。 即使今天AI突破的速度似乎很快,开发自我驾驶汽车、家务机器人和谈话伴侣等长期得到保障的技术也比许多人预期的要难得多。 这些重复周期的一个原因是我们对情报本身的性质和复杂性的理解有限。 在本文中,我描述了大赦国际研究人员共同假设中的四种谬误,这可能导致对该领域的过度自信预测。 最后,我讨论了这些谬误引发的公开问题,包括人类常识中装饰机器的古老挑战。