Experiments with both qualitative and quantitative factors occur frequently in practical applications. Many construction methods for this kind of designs, such as marginally coupled designs, were proposed to pursue some good space-filling structures. However, few criteria can be adapted to quantify the space-filling property of designs involving both qualitative and quantitative factors. As the uniformity is an important space-filling property of a design, in this paper, a new uniformity criterion, qualitative-quantitative discrepancy (QQD), is proposed for assessing the uniformity of designs with both types of factors. The closed form and lower bounds of the QQD are presented to calculate the exact QQD values of designs and recognize the uniform designs directly. In addition, a connection between the QQD and the balance pattern is derived, which not only helps to obtain a new lower bound but also provides a statistical justification of the QQD. Several examples show that the proposed criterion is reasonable and useful since it can distinguish distinct designs very well.
翻译:在实际应用中经常出现定性和定量因素的实验,许多这类设计的设计方法,例如略有结合的设计,都建议采用一些良好的空间填充结构,然而,很少可以调整标准来量化涉及定性和定量因素的设计的填充空间属性,由于统一性是设计中的一个重要空间填充属性,本文件建议采用一种新的统一性标准,即定性和定量差异(QQD),用以评估设计与两类因素的统一性,提出封闭式和低限的“D”表示设计精确的“D”值,并直接识别统一的设计。此外,还得出了“D”与平衡模式之间的联系,这不仅有助于获得新的较低约束,而且还为“D”提供了统计上的理由。几个例子表明,拟议的标准合理和有用,因为它能够很好地区分不同的设计。