The 2019/20 Black Summer bushfires in Australia demonstrated the brutal and disastrous consequences of changing the technological world without considering linkages with the biophysical, ecological or human worlds. An emerging more-than-human design philosophy encourages designers to consider such interrelations between humans and non-human entities. Yet, the design research community has focused on situated or embodied experiences for designers, rather than developing processes to legitimate the perspectives of non-human entities through participatory design. This paper explores how adopting the `intentional stance', a concept from philosophy, might provide a heuristic for more-than-human participatory design. Through experimentation with the intentional stance in the context of smart lighting systems, the paper demonstrates that the approach has potential for non-human entities from the ecological world, but less so for the biophysical world. The paper concludes by encouraging critique and evolution of the intentional stance, and of other approaches, to legitimate the perspectives of non-human entities in everyday design.
翻译:2019/20年的黑色夏季丛林大火在澳大利亚展示了在不考虑与生物物理、生态或人类世界之间的联系的情况下改变技术世界的惨烈和灾难性后果。新兴的超越人类的设计哲学鼓励设计师考虑人类和非人类实体之间的相互关系。然而,设计研究界专注于为设计师提供情境化或具身体验,而不是开发过程来通过参与式设计合法化非人类实体的观点。本文探讨了采用哲学中的"有意识立场"可能为超越人类的参与式设计提供启发。通过在智能照明系统的背景下对有意识立场进行实验,本文证明了该方法对于来自生态世界的非人类实体具有潜力,但对生物物理世界则较小。本文最后鼓励批判和进化有意识立场,以及其他方法,以合法化日常设计中非人类实体的观点。