Online platforms, including social media and search platforms, have routinely used their users' data for targeted ads, to improve their services, and to sell to third-party buyers. But an increasing awareness of the importance of users' data privacy has led to new laws that regulate data-sharing by platforms. Further, there have been political discussions on introducing data dividends, that is paying users for their data. Three interesting questions are then: When would these online platforms be incentivized to pay data dividends? How does their decision depend on whether users value their privacy more than the platform's free services? And should platforms invest in protecting users' data? This paper considers various factors affecting the users' and platform's decisions through utility functions. We construct a principal-agent model using a Stackelberg game to calculate their optimal decisions and qualitatively discuss the implications. Our results could inform a policymaker trying to understand the consequences of mandating data dividends.
翻译:在线平台,包括社交媒体和搜索平台,经常将用户数据用于有针对性的广告,改善他们的服务,并向第三方买主出售。但是,对用户数据隐私重要性的认识不断提高,导致制定了规范平台数据共享的新法律。此外,还就引入数据红利问题进行了政治讨论,向用户支付数据费用。然后有三个有趣的问题:这些在线平台何时能激励用户支付数据红利?他们的决定如何取决于用户是否更重视其隐私而不是平台的免费服务?平台应投资保护用户数据吗?本文应审议影响用户和平台决定的各种因素,通过实用功能。我们用斯塔克尔伯格游戏构建了一个主要代理模型,以计算他们的最佳决定,并定性地讨论其影响。我们的结果可以让决策者了解授权数据红利的后果。