Sharing research artifacts is known to help people to build upon existing knowledge, adopt novel contributions in practice, and increase the chances of papers receiving attention. In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), openly providing research artifacts plays a key role, even more so as the community targets a broader use of AI techniques, which can only become feasible if large open datasets and confidence measures for their quality are available. However, the current lack of common discipline-specific guidelines for research data sharing opens the opportunity for misunderstandings about the true potential of research artifacts and subjective expectations regarding artifact quality. To address this issue, we introduce a set of guidelines for artifact sharing specifically tailored to MDE research. To design this guidelines set, we systematically analyzed general-purpose artifact sharing practices of major computer science venues and tailored them to the MDE domain. Subsequently, we conducted an online survey with 90 researchers and practitioners with expertise in MDE. We investigated our participants' experiences in developing and sharing artifacts in MDE research and the challenges encountered while doing so. We then asked them to prioritize each of our guidelines as essential, desirable, or unnecessary. Finally, we asked them to evaluate our guidelines with respect to clarity, completeness, and relevance. In each of these dimensions, our guidelines were assessed positively by more than 92\% of the participants. To foster the reproducibility and reusability of our results, we make the full set of generated artifacts available in an open repository at \texttt{\url{https://mdeartifacts.github.io/}}.
翻译:分享研究文物是众所周知的,有助于人们利用现有知识,在实践中采用新的贡献,并增加获得关注的论文的机会。在模范发展工程公司(MDE)中,公开提供研究文物可发挥关键作用,甚至因为社区的目标是更广泛地使用AI技术,只有有大量开放的数据集和对其质量的建立信任措施,这些技术才能成为可行。然而,目前缺乏共同的学科特定研究数据共享准则,使人们有机会误解研究文物的真正潜力和对文物质量的主观期望。为解决这一问题,我们推出了一套专门针对MDE研究的艺术品共享准则。为了设计这套准则,我们系统地分析主要计算机科学场所的通用文物共享做法,并将其适应MDE领域。随后,我们与90名研究人员和从业人员进行了在线调查,调查了在MDE研究中开发和分享文物的经验以及在此过程中遇到的挑战。我们随后要求他们将我们的每一项准则列为重要、可取或不必要的优先事项。最后,我们要求他们以清晰、完整和完整的方式评估我们所生成的文献库的准确性、准确性、准确性、准确性、正确性、正确性、正确性、正确性地评估我们所生成的文献目录。