Technology applied in education can provide great benefits and overcome challenges by facilitating access to learning objects anywhere and anytime. However, technology alone is not enough, since it requires suitable planning and learning methodologies. Using technology can be problematic, especially in determining whether learning has occurred or not. Futhermore, if learning has not occured, technology can make it difficult to determine how to mitigate this lack of learning. This paper presents a set of new metrics for measuring student's acquired understanding of a content in technology-based education platforms. Some metrics were taken from the literature "as is", some were modified slighty, while others were added. The hypothesis is that we should not only focus on traditional scoring, because it only counts the number of hits/errors and does not consider any other aspect of learning. We applied all metrics to an assessment conducted in a high school class in which we show specific cases, along with metrics, where very useful information can be obtained from by combining several metrics. We conclude that the proposed metrics are promising for measuring student's acquired understanding of a content, as well as for teachers to measure student's weaknesses.
翻译:然而,单靠技术是不够的,因为它需要适当的规划和学习方法。 使用技术可能会有问题,特别是在确定是否发生过学习方面。 更远地说,如果没有发生学习,技术会使得难以确定如何减轻这种学习的缺乏。本文件提出了一套衡量学生对基于技术的教育平台内容的理解程度的新指标。从文献中得出的一些指标“如现在一样”,有些是微小的,而另一些则被添加。假设是,我们不应该仅仅侧重于传统的评分,因为它只计算出点击次数,而不考虑学习的任何其他方面。我们把所有指标都应用于在高中班进行的评估,在评估中我们展示了具体案例,加上衡量尺度,从中可以取得非常有用的信息。我们的结论是,拟议的衡量尺度对于衡量学生对内容的理解程度以及教师衡量学生的弱点很有希望。