In this paper we propose efficient methods for elicitation of complexly structured preferences and utilize these in problems of decision making under (severe) uncertainty. Based on the general framework introduced in Jansen, Schollmeyer and Augustin (2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason), we now design elicitation procedures and algorithms that enable decision makers to reveal their underlying preference system (i.e. two relations, one encoding the ordinal, the other the cardinal part of the preferences) while having to answer as few as possible simple ranking questions. Here, two different approaches are followed. The first approach directly utilizes the collected ranking data for obtaining the ordinal part of the preferences, while their cardinal part is constructed implicitly by measuring meta data on the decision maker's consideration times. In contrast, the second approach explicitly elicits also the cardinal part of the decision maker's preference system, however, only an approximate version of it. This approximation is obtained by additionally collecting labels of preference strength during the elicitation procedure. For both approaches, we give conditions under which they produce the decision maker's true preference system and investigate how their efficiency can be improved. For the latter purpose, besides data-free approaches, we also discuss ways for effectively guiding the elicitation procedure if data from previous elicitation rounds is available. Finally, we demonstrate how the proposed elicitation methods can be utilized in problems of decision under (severe) uncertainty. Precisely, we show that under certain conditions optimal decisions can be found without fully specifying the preference system.
翻译:在本文件中,我们提出了在(严重)不确定性下吸引结构复杂的优惠的有效方法,并在决策问题上使用这些方法。根据Jansen、Scholmeyer和Augustin(2018年,Int.J.Approx.理由)提出的总框架,我们现在设计了引引程序和算法,使决策者能够披露其基本优惠制度(即,两种关系,一种将标准编码,另一种是优惠的主要部分),同时必须回答尽可能多的简单排序问题。这里遵循两种不同方法。第一种方法是直接利用收集的排名数据来获得优惠的正本部分,而其主要部分则通过测量决策者审议时间的元数据(2018年,Int.J.Approx.理由)。相比之下,第二种方法还明确提出了决策者偏爱制度的主要部分(即两种关系,一种是将标准编码,另一个是优惠制度的主要部分),同时需要尽可能少地收集出优惠强度的标签。两种方法都遵循两种方法,即:第一种方法是直接利用所收集的排名数据,而我们则在产生决策者的真正优惠制度下提供的条件,然后对数据进行精确地分析,我们如何确定效率的方法。