Interacting agents receive public information at no cost and flexibly acquire private information at a cost proportional to entropy reduction. When a policymaker provides more public information, agents acquire less private information, thus lowering information costs. Does more public information raise or reduce uncertainty faced by agents? Is it beneficial or detrimental to welfare? To address these questions, we examine the impacts of public information on flexible information acquisition in a linear-quadratic-Gaussian game with arbitrary quadratic material welfare. More public information raises uncertainty if and only if the game exhibits strategic complementarity, which can be harmful to welfare. However, when agents acquire a large amount of information, more provision of public information increases welfare through a substantial reduction in the cost of information. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for welfare to increase with public information and identify optimal public information disclosure, which is either full or partial disclosure depending upon the welfare function and the slope of the best response.
翻译:互动者免费获得公共信息,并灵活获取私人信息,费用与减少英特律相当; 当决策者提供更多的公共信息时,代理人获得的私人信息较少,从而降低信息费用; 更多的公共信息是否增加或减少代理人面临的不确定性? 是否对福利有利或有害? 为解决这些问题,我们检查在单线-赤道-加西南游戏中,以任意的二次物质福利为条件,公共信息对灵活信息获取的影响; 更多的公共信息,如果而且只有在游戏显示战略互补性,可能对福利有害时,才会引起不确定性; 但是,当决策者获得大量信息,更多的公共信息,通过大幅降低信息成本,增加福利; 我们为福利创造必要和充分的条件,增加公共信息,并确定最佳公共信息披露,这取决于福利功能和最佳应对的斜坡,即全部或部分披露。