Multiple importance sampling (MIS) is an increasingly used methodology where several proposal densities are used to approximate integrals, generally involving target probability density functions. The use of several proposals allows for a large variety of sampling and weighting schemes. Then, the practitioner must choose a given scheme, i.e., sampling mechanism and weighting function. A variance analysis has been proposed in Elvira et al (2019, Statistical Science 34, 129-155), showing the superiority of the balanced heuristic estimator with respect to other competing schemes in some scenarios. However, some of their results are valid only for two proposals. In this paper, we extend and generalize these results, providing novel proofs that allow to determine the variance relations among MIS schemes.
翻译:多重重要性抽样(MIS)是一种日益使用的方法,其中若干提议密度用于粗略组合,通常涉及目标概率密度功能;使用若干提议可以采用多种抽样和加权办法;然后,执业者必须选择某一办法,即抽样机制和加权功能;在Elvira等人(2019年,统计科学34,129-155年)中提出了差异分析,表明平衡的超常估计值在某些情况下优于其他相互竞争的计划;然而,其中一些结果只适用于两项提议;在本文件中,我们扩大和概括了这些结果,提供了新的证据,以便确定MIS计划之间的差异关系。