Causal loops, e.g., in time travel, come with two main problems. Most prominently, the grandfather antinomy describes the potentiality to inconsistencies: a problem of logical nature. The other problem is called information antinomy and is lesser known. Yet, it describes a variant of the former: There are not too few consistent solutions -- namely none -- but too many. At a first glance, the information antinomy does not seem as problematic as the grandfather antinomy, because there is no apparent logical contradiction. In this work we show that, however, both problems are equivalent under interventions: If parties can intervene in such a way that the information antinomy arises, then they can also intervene to generate a contradiction, and vice versa.
翻译:最突出的是,祖父的抗生素描述了不一致的可能性:一个逻辑性的问题。另一个问题被称为信息抗生素,而不太为人所知。然而,它描述了前者的一个变式:没有太多一致的解决方案(即没有一种),而是太多。乍一看,信息抗生素似乎不像祖父的抗生素那样有问题,因为没有明显的逻辑矛盾。然而,在这项工作中,我们表明,在干预中,这两个问题都是一样的:如果各方能够以某种方式进行干预,使信息抗生素产生,那么它们也可以进行干预,产生矛盾,反之亦然。