Knowledge probing is crucial for understanding the knowledge transfer mechanism behind the pre-trained language models (PLMs). Despite the growing progress of probing knowledge for PLMs in the general domain, specialised areas such as biomedical domain are vastly under-explored. To catalyse the research in this direction, we release a well-curated biomedical knowledge probing benchmark, MedLAMA, which is constructed based on the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus. We test a wide spectrum of state-of-the-art PLMs and probing approaches on our benchmark, reaching at most 3% of acc@10. While highlighting various sources of domain-specific challenges that amount to this underwhelming performance, we illustrate that the underlying PLMs have a higher potential for probing tasks. To achieve this, we propose Contrastive-Probe, a novel self-supervised contrastive probing approach, that adjusts the underlying PLMs without using any probing data. While Contrastive-Probe pushes the acc@10 to 28%, the performance gap still remains notable. Our human expert evaluation suggests that the probing performance of our Contrastive-Probe is still under-estimated as UMLS still does not include the full spectrum of factual knowledge. We hope MedLAMA and Contrastive-Probe facilitate further developments of more suited probing techniques for this domain.
翻译:知识检测对于理解预先培训的语言模式(PLM)背后的知识转让机制至关重要。尽管在普通领域对PLMs的检测知识日益进步,但生物医学领域等专业领域在探索方面远远不足。为了推动这方面的研究,我们发布了一个完善的生物医学知识检测基准,MedLAMA,这是基于统一医疗语言系统(UMLS)的代词词词库建造的。我们测试了多种最先进的PLMs和对基准的探测方法,达到最高3 % ACC@10。在强调各种具体领域挑战的来源的同时,与这种低劣业绩相当,我们展示了基础的PLMMS具有更大的潜力。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一种新型的自我监督的对比性测试方法,在不使用任何检测数据的情况下调整了基本的PLMSMs。虽然我们对比性将cc@10推向28 %,但绩效差距仍然显著,而与此同时,我们还在突出的是,我们的PLMSDMS的准确性评估中并不包括我们相对性评估的全域。