Who joins extremist movements? Answering this question poses considerable methodological challenges. Survey techniques are practically infeasible and selective samples provide no counterfactual. Assigning recruits to contextual units provides one solution, but is vulnerable to problems of ecological inference. In this article, we take inspiration from epidemiology and the protest literature and elaborate a technique to combine survey and ecological approaches. The rare events, multilevel Bayesian contaminated case-control design we propose accounts for individual-level and contextual factors, as well as spatial autocorrelation in the incidence of recruitment. We validate our approach by matching a sample of Islamic State (ISIS) fighters from nine Muslim-majority countries with representative population surveys enumerated shortly before recruits joined the movement. We find that high status individuals in their early twenties who had university education were more likely to join ISIS. We find more mixed evidence for relative deprivation.
翻译:回答这个问题会带来相当大的方法挑战。 调查技术实际上不可行,选择性的抽样并不能提供反事实。 将新招募到背景单位提供一种解决办法,但容易受到生态推论问题的影响。 在文章中,我们从流行病学和抗议文献中汲取灵感,并拟订一种方法,将调查和生态方法结合起来。 稀有事件、多层次的贝叶斯污染案例控制设计,我们建议说明个人水平和背景因素,以及在招募事件中的空间自动关系。我们通过将来自9个穆斯林占多数国家的伊斯兰国家战斗人员的抽样与在招募加入运动前不久所列举的有代表性的人口调查相匹配来验证我们的做法。我们发现,在他们早期的20多岁受过大学教育的人更可能加入伊斯兰科学信息系统。我们发现,相对贫困的更多证据是混杂的。