Passengers of level 3-5 autonomous personal mobility vehicles (APMV) can perform non-driving tasks, such as reading books and smartphones, while driving. It has been pointed out that such activities may increase motion sickness, especially when frequently avoiding pedestrians or obstacles in shared spaces. Many studies have been conducted to build countermeasures, of which various computational motion sickness models have been developed. Among them, models based on subjective vertical conflict (SVC) theory, which describes vertical changes in direction sensed by human sensory organs v.s. those expected by the central nervous system, have been actively developed. However, no current computational model can integrate visual vertical information with vestibular sensations. We proposed a 6 DoF SVC-VV model which added a visually perceived vertical block into a conventional 6 DoF SVC model to predict visual vertical directions from image data simulating the visual input of a human. In a driving experiment, 27 participants experienced an APMV with two visual conditions: looking ahead (LAD) and working with a tablet device (WAD). We verified that passengers got motion sickness while riding the APMV, and the symptom were severer when especially working on it, by simulating the frequent pedestrian avoidance scenarios of the APMV in the experiment. In addition, the results of the experiment demonstrated that the proposed 6 DoF SVC-VV model could describe the increased motion sickness experienced when the visual vertical and gravitational acceleration directions were different.
翻译:3-5级自主个人机动车辆(APMV)的乘客在驾驶时可以从事非驾驶性任务,如阅读书籍和智能手机等;已经指出,这类活动可能会增加运动性疾病,特别是在经常避免行人或共同空间的障碍时;已经进行了许多研究,以建立反措施,其中已经开发了各种计算性运动疾病模型;根据主观垂直冲突理论(SVC)的模型,其中描述了人类感官器官与中枢神经系统预期的垂直方向变化,已经积极开发;然而,目前没有计算模型能够将视觉纵向信息与背心感结合;我们提议了一个6 DoF SVC-VVV模式,将视觉纵向障碍添加到常规的6 DOF SVC模式,以预测图像数据中的视觉垂直方向,模拟人类的视觉输入;在一次驾驶实验中,27名与会者经历了一个动动动脉式MV,有两个视觉模型:向前看(LAD),与一个平板仪(WAD)一起工作。我们证实,乘客在乘坐APMV期间运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动运动时,在SVVAVVV的频率上显示的频繁的周期试验中增加了。